- Design And Implement Engaging And Flexible
Learning Experiences For Individuals And Groups.

“Mark always develops great teaching aids to help with the lesson engagement and
has very good ideas for developing flexible lessons related to a variety of curriculum areas”

Gay Quelhurst - Midway Report - Term 3 2008

Standard 1 embodies the overarching principle of the Teaching and Learning cluster as can be seen from the QTC graphic on the preceding page.  Accordingly, the fulfilment of Standards 2, 3, 4, and 5 also rely to some extent on the educator’s ability to engage the students and to flexibly accommodate their various needs (Fetherston, 2006).

Creating engaging learning experiences requires that the material be tailored to the students and the environment be student centred (Woolfolk & Margetts, 2007).  Appropriate differentiation and mediation of the curriculum is vital, particularly in a primary setting (Eggen & Kauchak, 2006).  Accordingly, the method and manner of material  presentation must be sensitive to the preoperational, concrete operational or formally operant status of individual students (Piaget, 1962).  It is now well understood that learning is not a thing transmitted whole from one person to another.  It is socially co-constructed and hence, engaging experiences are those in which students’ existing worldviews are known, respected and built upon.  It follows from this that learning is often constructed in peer groups, semi-independent of superordinate involvement, and that such peer interactivity has a part to play in engaging learning experiences (Daniels, 2001).

Student engagement is also far higher when the cognitive and learning styles of individuals are flexibly accommodated.  As Woolfolk & Margetts (2007) note, flexibility of this kind improves student motivation.  It is also good practice to present material that appeals to a variety of modalities.  Visual, aural, kinaesthetic, active, passive, written, oral, single, grouped - flexible lessons are modulated to recognise success delivered by various vehicles in keeping with Gardner’s (1983) seminal findings on multiple intelligences.

One of the means of that modulation and a further key to engaging today’s techno-savvy students is Information and Communications Technology (Malone, 2006; O'Hanlon, 2007).  Extensive experience in digital graphics and information technology enable me to deliver broad areas of curriculum concept using digital media.

An example of a flexible learning experience that achieved enthusiastic embrace by my students is the Science Unit on Genetics and Inheritance that I delivered to a composite Grade 6-7 class at St Anthony’s.  The unit featured (in addition to traditional modalities) a blend of multi-media including YouTube videos, illustrative animations, digital graphics and online investigations.  Homework and revision was presented on-line in unit-dedicated web pages and assessment included considerable choice and authenticity.  In this way, material was presented that was flexibly accessible to a wide range of learning styles and preferences (Woolfolk & Margetts, 2007), in class time and at home. Click Here. (New Window)

Bibliography

- Design And Implement Learning Experiences
That Develop Language, Literacy And Numeracy

 “The children particularly enjoyed his hands on Science and Maths lessons which enabled independent and group work, which stimulated thinking and language development as well as covering the curriculum areas”

Gay Quelhurst - Referee Statement 2009

The position of the Queensland Department of Education and Training (2009) is that both literacy and numeracy are integral to effective learning, teaching and assessing in all curriculum areas and across all phases of learning.  Words and numbers are at the heart of human semiotics and understanding them is the portal through which one must pass to convene with all other learning.   

It follows then, that in addition to class time dedicated specifically to language and number skills, numeracy and literacy should be integrated into almost all lessons in a Primary setting (Department of Education and Training, 2009).  A fractions lesson can integrate the etymology of the word “decimal”,  SOSE lessons may provide the platform for engaging with proportion.  

Yet languages change over time with the ebb and flow of cultural patterns and values.  Accordingly, an effective teacher needs to keep abreast of the shifting definition of literacy, broadening, as it does to include new media and methods.  Additionally, a variety of genres  should be considered, such as brief notes, shopping lists, traffic signs and advertising. All these offer opportunities to anchor phonics in something real. As do learning experiences that explore the ways that different communication methods and social, cultural and historical contexts influence language choice, appropriate discourse and literacy and numeracy practices (Queensland College of Teachers, 2006).

In monitoring and evaluating students’ literacy and numeracy needs, teachers who tend to look for patterns of errors across the work of individuals and groups and respond with targeted instruction, are more likely to make an impact on children's development (Neuman, Snow, & Canizares, 2007).

My own preference is to immerse students in real examples of the literacy or numeracy aspect being addressed.  I use a variety of media to explore those aspects, guiding students toward evaluation and synthesis of the aspects of language or numbers under study.  I tend to introduce language and number terms and rules during discussion and encourage student interaction and demonstration if appropriate.  I may have students notice and analyse, for example, how the poet uses adjectival phrases to create pictures, or how the near-10 strategy for mental arithmetic reveals numeric patterns.

Examples of teaching aids that I have developed and used include:

A fun interactive factorisation game helpful in reinforcing number concepts, click here.

A YouTube video used to ground a lesson on proportion in real world concepts, click here.

An interactive tool for exploring direct speech punctuation and creative language alternatives, click here.

Bibliography

- Design And Implement
Intellectually Challenging Learning Experiences

 “Mark was able to deliver lessons that engaged and challenged his students.
His knowledge of the curriculum was very thorough.
He used technology well within his lessons to enhance learning outcomes”

Chris Cawley - Referee Statement 2009

As the QTC (2006) itself acknowledges, comprehensive understanding of the central concepts, modes of inquiry and structures of the discipline areas they teach is central to allowing educators to challenge their students.  In this I am most fortunate to have a reservoir of curriculum relevant knowledge and understanding that is both broad and deep.

I have also gained a solid grasp of the manner in which learning takes place and how knowledge is accumulated and retained.  Piaget (1962) is credited with first realising that children's learning capacity develops in approximate step with their capacity for abstract thought.  They frame the world in schemas that are constantly disputed by the realities that they encounter, requiring that they either assimilate or accommodate new input.  Hence, challenging learning experiences are those that create disequilibration in student schemas then resolve those tensions by calibrating tasks to the Zone of Proximal Development of the students (Daniels, 2001).  Novel and difficult concepts also need to be appropriately scaffolded and social discourse has a role to play in allowing students to first appropriate, then internalise new understandings (Vygotsky, 1997).

Incorporation of higher order thinking skills into learning experiences is also fundamental to challenging students (Queensland College of Teachers, 2006).  Lessons that impart knowledge have their place, but lessons that oblige students further to apply, analyse, synthesise and evaluate that knowledge promote deeper and more focused engagement with the content (Bloom, 1956).

One sequence of learning experiences that I designed to extend students was intended for Grade 5.  The lesson concept plans show students were consistently challenged with higher order requirements at the upper end of  Bloom’s Taxonomy to “translate”, “reverse”, “apply”, “transpose”, “approximate” and “create.  Click here (large file - 500Kb)

Another sequence of lessons on “Water” that I delivered to Grade 1-2 students and which is available online will also demonstrate.  Each week groups of students were presented with a different provocation, such as explaining what had happened to the salt that disappeared when they stirred the water in which I had placed it.  There were five similar lessons, each them challenging in different ways.  Click here (New Window)

Bibliography

- Design And Implement
Learning Experiences That Value Diversity

1-2Q is a class full of diverse needs and a diversity of backgrounds.  Mark managed to teach/ plan to the needs of all students.  He showed an interest in learning about each child and their needs, and always had methods in place to make sure all children were not only included, but participated at a level at which they were comfortable.

Gay Quelhurst - Practicum Report - Term 3, 2008

 “Diversity” implies, and Hickey (2006) concurs, that each person brings with them to the classroom an idiosyncratic contextual locatedness - the distinctive confluence of physical, cultural, social, emotional and cognitive circumstances that have framed their world view.  Accordingly, I do not expect that the people in my classes will be of particular types or that they will fit into categories at all.   Rather, the opposite, that each of them will bring a unique blend of antecedents which, when shared and celebrated, can nourish our class community. Some research (Simonton, 2000 cited in; Woolfolk & Margetts, 2007) even suggests that exposure to diverse perspectives encourages creativity and lateral minded problem solving.

Brown (2006) describes inclusive learning environments as those in which each child is appreciated for what they themselves bring to a setting.   Hence, nurturing diversity necessarily means that teachers imbue their classrooms with a positive atmosphere that recognises these contributions.  Thus, having a goal of accommodating and supporting, not only learner’s academic requirements, but their social and cultural needs as well, ensures that all class members’ voices are heard and their values respected.

Classroom practices that reinforce the value of diversity can include direct instruction, modelling of value laden behaviours and providing a variety of success pathways to optimise cultural neutrality (Fetherston, 2006).  Students can be matter-of-factly familiarised with aids and devices for disabled students such that they are demystified (Woolfolk & Margetts, 2007).  Educators should also be sensitive to the patterns of interaction that children have with their parents, and attempt to emulate this style if possible (Freeman, 1998).

Two YouTube videos that I created for practicum classes also encouraged students to value diversity and appreciate our privileged circumstances. One presents imagery of the diverse peoples of the world trapped by hunger & destitution, click here. The other heightens awareness of refugees with a message of hope, click here.

Mentor teachers commented as follows on my ability to fulfil this Professional Standard:-

Mark was very supportive of all students needs and was inclusive in his approach to all learning activities”

Bryan Simpson  - Referee Statement 2009

“He obviously enjoys relating to the children and makes every effort to include all the children in the learning process”

Gay Quelhurst - Practicum Report - Term 2, 2008

 “He was consistent in managing the students and responsive to their needs”

Bryan Simpson - Practicum Report - Term 1, 2009

Bibliography

- Assess And Report Constructively
On Student Learning

 “Mark demonstrated a range of assessment practices across all curriculum areas.
He was able to use assessment tasks to enhance further learning experiences.
Mark was able to provide formal assessment tasks and data that were relevant and accurate.”

Bryan Simpson - Practicum Report - Term 1, 2009

My approach to designing assessment instruments is in keeping with current understandings that are widely espoused in the literature, see, for example, Wiggins (2005), Banks (2005) and Fetherston (2006).  Amongst the shared principles laid down by those authors are that: assessment should engender learning as well as determine what has been learnt; students motivation is enhanced when learning’s real world usefulness is perceptible to them; assessment processes should be incremental and earlier assessment tasks should prepare learners for later tasks and; assessment should be authentic.

Additionally, quality assessment manifests several other key characteristics.  It should be valid, in that it measures what it intends to measure and reliable, in that it is an accurate measure of student performance (Fetherston, 2006).  Central to flexibility in assessment is the concept of choice, which, according to Wood & Smith (1999), can be applied, inter alia, to timing, style, media, content, and method.   Assessment must also to be fair.  Fairness, while less concrete, more subject to cultural mores than the parameters above (Woolfolk & Margetts, 2007), can still integrated with assessment instruments through acknowledgement and accommodation of variegated students’ needs (Killen, 2005).

Teachers are required to report their assessment of student attainment to other education professionals, government instrumentalities and, of course, to parents.  Accordingly, collaboration, both among educators and with parents, while closely related to Standards Nine and Eight respectively, is also fundamental to meaningful reportage (Queensland College of Teachers, 2008).  Such reports fulfil a variety of purposes like progress information, accreditation, guidance for educational reformers and infrastructure planners and hence its reliability and accuracy is vital.

During my second professional attachment I developed a major instrument of assessment for a Science Unit on Genetics which embodied many of the principles outlined above.  It evinced validity in that it measured what it intended - broad understanding of taxonomy, genetics & inheritance. It was reliable because it returned comparable results between theoretically equal student cohorts, irrespective of evaluation personnel.  It was flexible through its provision of student choices and that flexibility enabled it to accommodate the diversity of student needs, which is the very essence of fairness. Its authenticity is derived from the significant component of rich tasks rooted in performance types that are valued in real world activity.  Click Here. (New Window)

“He presented positive and constructive feedback to students”

Bryan Simpson  - Referee Statement 2009

Bibliography